It is better to have a feature to have the visibility of
one investor to the other investors? And also to make a feature to
message/communicate between investors.
This will create/open a communication channel between investors and transfer of investment ideas and to grow among themselves.
Is it better to have a feature to have the visibility of one investor to the other investors and also to make a feature to message/communicate between investors. This will create/open a communication channel between investors and transfer of investment
put all value measurements (except for manager tokens) in gvt by default, clickable to convert to USD
mixing gvt and dollars on the same page is confusing. only one unit should be used at once, in all sections of the platform. We could be able to switch from gvt to usd and back by clicking on any gvt or usd amount
just noticed that when i look through a managers trade history and switch to another manager it takes me to that page on their portfolio too.
eg i look at manager 1 pages 1-3, leaving on page 3 i got to manager 2... i am then back on page 3 of theirs.
no biggy just a little improvement to tie up
When sorting managers by profit, sort by % profit, not absolute value (or add 'sort by % profit' option)
For manager whose AuM has been increasing, but who had a poor performance on the last period, you can have a situation where total profit is negative, but average profit is positive. This is confusing.
I think the total profit metric should be removed, as what is interesting for an investor is the profit expectancy for each period, which is best given by average profit. Therefore the Average profit metric is the most relevant one.
In manager profile page, in the "requests" section, withdrawals should be labeled in GVT, not in manager token, so that investors can compare what they invested and withdrew at a glance
Customer support service by UserEcho